About loneliness

Is that loneliness really loneliness? And is loneliness itself a matter of loneliness? This book affirms loneliness. There are countless stories of friendship, love, and beautiful connections. They are wonderful. But if they are wonderful, should loneliness, as the opposite concept, be denied? Loneliness and solidarity can coexist. And each has its own beauty. Without being pulled into "one or the other," we can be lonely while sometimes connecting, and we can affirm loneliness. Natural disasters and wars call for greater unity among people, and division is lamented. However, differences are different. It is difficult to settle the issue by competing over which side is right and which is wrong. In fact, such a settlement should not be reached. We are all born alone, and we die alone, with our own differences. A society with diversity where these diverse individuals can simply exist is what should be realized. Also, when loneliness is portrayed in a positive light, it is often portrayed as a beautiful, loneliness that aims for heights. Of course, these are also forms of loneliness that should be affirmed, but here we also affirm the smaller loneliness that is closer to us, the loneliness of being alone. On the other hand, he criticizes loneliness, social isolation, bullying, poverty, etc., which should be avoided. I don't think being alone is sweet and without any bitterness. Even if you love solitude, you will still feel loneliness and emptiness. Loneliness is not just about cutting off all ties with society. It is about living life without losing one's sensitivity. I would like to convey this to those who love solitude in the same way. "That loneliness is right."